Last month, I helped facilitate a workshop on respect in the workplace, leading a discussion on personal values and how they affect our professional behavior. Since our values significantly impact the decisions we make, it was important to have our participants spend some time reflecting on their own and the behaviors that would ideally correspond with them.
In that discussion, our participants defined a value both as something of importance and as a compass that guides us. They also discussed and came up with a brief list of possible universal values; those core ideals which would likely be just as important to individuals from any country our demographic in the world. While not validated beyond our discussion, our group’s list included:
So what happens when we work with individuals who we believe are challenging or even attacking our personal values?
Often, we start to feel defensive and in return start to resent those individuals.
But what if we realized that most of us share similar values, possibly some from our list above, but simply act on them differently? Would there be more understanding in the workplace? Maybe the way I demonstrate the importance of family simply looks different from the person in the next cubicle.
This is especially true in workplaces that are multigenerational. Again, family, as a value, is a good example. It may be a shared value by many but individually acted on by different employees. Doesn’t a parent, who has young children and needs to take time off to care for them when they are sick, deserve the same respect as an employee who has to take time off to assist with an elderly parent?
What do you think?